Abstract Most structural health monitoring methods focus on using dynamic responses to detect and locate damage (i.e. items I and II above) because they are global methods that can provide rapid inspection of large structural systems. These dynamic-based methods can be divided into four groups: (1) spatial-domain methods, (2) modal-domain methods, (3) time-domain methods, and (4) frequency- domain methods. Spatial-domain methods use changes of mass, damping, and stiffness matrices to detect and locate damage. Modal-domain methods use changes of natural frequencies, modal damping ratios, and mode shapes to detect damage.
Heiza, K., Khalil, A., & El Nawawy, O. (2016). State of the Art Review on Bridges Structural Health Monitoring (Model Testing). The International Conference on Civil and Architecture Engineering, 11(11PthP International Conference on Civil and Architecture Engineering), 1-21. doi: 10.21608/iccae.2016.43759
MLA
Khaled M. Heiza; Ayman H. Khalil; Omar A. El Nawawy. "State of the Art Review on Bridges Structural Health Monitoring (Model Testing)", The International Conference on Civil and Architecture Engineering, 11, 11PthP International Conference on Civil and Architecture Engineering, 2016, 1-21. doi: 10.21608/iccae.2016.43759
HARVARD
Heiza, K., Khalil, A., El Nawawy, O. (2016). 'State of the Art Review on Bridges Structural Health Monitoring (Model Testing)', The International Conference on Civil and Architecture Engineering, 11(11PthP International Conference on Civil and Architecture Engineering), pp. 1-21. doi: 10.21608/iccae.2016.43759
VANCOUVER
Heiza, K., Khalil, A., El Nawawy, O. State of the Art Review on Bridges Structural Health Monitoring (Model Testing). The International Conference on Civil and Architecture Engineering, 2016; 11(11PthP International Conference on Civil and Architecture Engineering): 1-21. doi: 10.21608/iccae.2016.43759
)
View on SCiNiTO